Re: unsigned short for nlink_t

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 14:53:57 -0500 (EST)


On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Russell Coker wrote:

> Currently we have an unsigned short used for the number of hard links to a
> file.
> I have an application which uses 30,000 hard links and I had hoped to scale
> it to more than 64K hard links...
>
> Is there any possibility that this could be changed in future kernels? Or is
> POSIX forcing it to be only a 16bit number?

Physical layout of many filesystems doesn't support that. Ditto for NFS,
IIRC.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/