> > All seem to run perfectly well with this new patch, at least in read only
> > mode. The only strange thing is the size of some directories, but maybe
> > that's perfectly normal.
>
> Could you show me what the difference is?
Most directories appear with size 0 or 4096, some with 2048 and a few with
sizes like 12288, 20480, 229376, etc. Those numbers doesn't seem to be
related to the number of files in the directories nor to the amount of
data stored in them.
> > By the way, what is the status of the ntfs write access ? Last time I
> > tried it, it screwd up my partition so that NT couldn't access it
> > anymore (hopefully Linux could still).
>
> I'm not touching as I have no means of testing it.
I can set up a test partition if it is of any use. Symptoms under Linux
were that I couldn't create files larger than one block: they got
truncated, but the created block had correct data int it.
I'll try to see if I can find something wrong in the code.
Jean-Philippe GRIMALDI
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/