> I'm finishing symlink patch now and then I'll return to AFFS (it has
> _lots_ of other problems). IIRC, Steve Dodd had some plans regarding NTFS.
Umm, yes. Unfortunately I've got the plans but not the time, so maybe it's
best not to rely on me to fix anything, though. As soon as find some free
time I will try to do so something constructive, but I don't know what that
might be.
> I can do NTFS part, but there may be a better way. Steve, had you looked
> at *BSD implementation? If it's decent enough we could just take it and
> replace the glue - it might be cleaner solution.
I'll see if I can find time to snarf the *BSD stuff and take a look, but
no promises. Meanwhile, maybe it's time to start rattling the "remove
orphaned filesystems from 2.4" sword in its scabbard, in the direction
of Martin von L.
--
The phrase "and then the company is screwed" is never something you want to
put in your business plan.
-- Bruce Schneier, "Security Pitfalls in Cryptography"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/