Re: 2.3.31 doc update

Hans-Joachim Baader (hans@grumbeer.inka.de)
Sun, 12 Dec 1999 20:17:02 +0100 (MET)


Hi Richard,

> Hans-Joachim Baader writes:
> > Documentation/Changes claims that binutils 2.9.1.0.7 are needed.
> > I think this is no longer sufficient. It should be 2.9.5.x.
>
> Really? Why? 2.9.1.0.7 is working fine for me.

I got some assembler errors in bootsect.S IIRC, after upgrading it
worked fine. Perhaps it's my mistake: I don't know if I had 2.9.1
or 2.9.1.0.15 installed, and maybe upgrading to 2.9.1.0.7 would
have solved the problem.

Regards,
hjb

-- 
You feel strangely lucky...
http://www.pro-linux.de/ - Germany's largest volunteer Linux support site

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/