Re: Bloat? (khttpd)

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:49:06 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > >
> > > Performance, and *modularity*. khttpd doesn't affect anything else in
> > > the kernel, and so is a rather harmless optional feature.
> >
> > There where times where for example /proc was an option too...
> >
>
> /proc was never modular. It touches *everything*, which makes it

No, now it doesn't. It used to, and that made it a whole friggin' pain in
ass whenever we did anything near VFS. Right now _nothing_ outside of
fs/proc should care about procfs internals. There are 4 or 5 places that
still do and IMO each of such cases is a bug.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/