Re: Unexecutable stack

Jesse Pollard (pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil)
Mon, 27 Dec 1999 11:56:25 -0600 (CST)


Mike Karmyshev <mike@katren.ru>:
>Hello.
>I've recently played a bit with Solar Designer's patch and it looks that
>it doesn't have any
>significant overhead. Shoudn't it be in the kernel by default(at
>least,SECURE_STACK)?

I'm in favor of that, and would like it to be a build option. I do understand
that some applications might user executable stack in a valid manner, (things
like matlab?) but most systems would be more secure if the stack were not
executable. Especially routers, firewalls, and dedicated file/print servers.

Where is that patch (pretty please...:)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/