Re: wait_on_irq, CPU1
Horst von Brand (vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl)
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 22:31:38 -0300
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> sagte:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 12:47:01PM -0600, Bill Wendling wrote:
> > } + module_start = PAGE_OFFSET + (max_mapnr << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > } + module_start = ((module_start + VMALLOC_OFFSET) & ~(VMALLOC_OFFSET-1));
> > } +
> > } + i = 1;
> > } + while (((long) stack & (8192-1)) != 0) {
> > ^^^^
> > Would it be a better idea to use a #defined value here (and in other
> > places) such as THREAD_SIZE to avoid confusion? Just a suggestion.
> THREAD_SIZE is not defined in 2.2, only in 2.3. The code needs to work
> under 2.2.
In that case, do a:
#ifndef THREAD_SIZE
#define THREAD_SIZE 8192
#endif
The code had better be readable. The above can then be removed later, and
won't do any harm anyway.
--
Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Viņa del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/