Re: Unexecutable Stack / Buffer Overflow Exploits...
Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:37:39 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Both stackguard and the last option requires some CPU overhead at
> run-time; the first two don't require any overhead at all. Note that
> some of approaches, such as changing the stack location randomly will
> stop certain attacks that the Solar Designer patch won't catch.
Is there any reason we cant do the first 2 immediately?
FWIW I thought solar designer patch did do the first one.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/