Re: BIND: Lame server?

From: Steve Dodd (steved@loth.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 03:47:26 EST

Next message: Michael Kujawa: "Re: Trying to be secure behind a cable modem"
Previous message: Steve Dodd: "Re: sendmail SPAM"
In reply to: Denis Voitenko: "BIND: Lame server?"
Next in thread: Glynn Clements: "Re: BIND: Lame server?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 01:17:51AM -0500, Denis Voitenko wrote:

> What exactly does "lame server" in named terms mean?

A lame server is one which is listed as being a name server for a zone, but
which is returning non-authoritative responses.

-- 
If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it.
                -- Arthur Kasspe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Michael Kujawa: "Re: Trying to be secure behind a cable modem"
Previous message: Steve Dodd: "Re: sendmail SPAM"
In reply to: Denis Voitenko: "BIND: Lame server?"
Next in thread: Glynn Clements: "Re: BIND: Lame server?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:29 EST