Sorry I forgot to mention that B is in C's host table.
All connections from B to C are fine (telnet, ftp, etc.).
Only thing that might be strange in my setup is that
B's connection to C is on eth0 and B's connection
to A, as well as the DNS, is on eth1.
Using netconf, I've turned off the required usage of
DNS and restarted inetd. Didn't seem to make a difference
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Serge Maandag wrote:
> It seems to me that C is trying to resolve B's address or is doing a reverse
> lookup. My guess is this is a DNS-problem. Add B to C's host table. The
> delay will probably be away.
> Serge Maandag.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tuan Hoang [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: maandag 31 januari 2000 8:27
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: long FTP connect on hosts not in DNS
> I've been using Red Hat 6.1 for a while and
> haven't noticed the following peculiarity until now.
> Let's say I have 3 hosts: A, B, C
> B is on subnet 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0
> A is only on subnet 192.168.2.0
> C is only on subnet 192.168.1.0
> A and B are in the DNS (using net 192.168.1.0)
> C is defined in B's host table as (IP C's FQ Hostname)
> A B C
> |_____| |____|
> If I ftp from A to B, everything is fine. But when
> I ftp from C to B, the server doesn't let me login for
> about 25 seconds or so. The strange thing is that telnet
> is without this latency.
> My /etc/resolve.conf on host B has:
> search mitre.org
> <1st DNS IP>
> <2nd DNS IP>
> <3rd DNS IP>
> I'm also running the latest Red Hat wu-ftpd.
> Thanks in advance,
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:34 EST