Just a follow up for all. I can't endorse any product, and I'm not saying
to buy the ones I've used over others, just these are the ones I've found
with your help:
Kingston KNE100TX - an 1 port PCI 10/100 with FDX LED indicator.
D-Link DFE-570TX - a 4 port PCI 10/100 with FDX LED indicator.
These both initialized as real tulips, and the chips on them are labeled
with "21143," and so far they look very good, but YMMV. I'm going to begin
doing some heavy-duty testing with the DFE-570TX, I need to build a 2 or 3
port firewall that will handle 60,000 pps at around 60Mbit/s (input +
One thing I found quite interesting is that instead of being labeled
"digital" they now have the Intel "i" on them... I guess this went to Intel
when Compaq bought Digital? I have no idea, but am eager to learn more
about it - I hope Intel doesn't do away with this chipset.
---- Dani Roisman email@example.com (310) 840-8753
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Garzik [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 00 1:23 PM > To: Roisman, Dani > Cc: 'email@example.com' > Subject: Re: Looking for real DEC chipset for Tulip driver > > "Roisman, Dani" wrote: > > > > Can anyone direct me to a currently manufactured product that uses the > real > > Digital chipset? I have had amazing experience with them, on a PII-266 > > firewall with a 2.0.35 kernel, at about 15,000 pps (input plus output), > > running ipfwadm, I am able to push 92-95 Mbit/s. > > > > About a year ago, I bought some Netgear 310TX cards, which had the real > DEC > > chipset. Recently, I bought a few more, but they have the Lite-On > chipset, > > and don't function as well with the stock Tulip driver (exhibiting some > > packet loss under load). NetGear recommended that I use their modified > > tulip driver that is included on their driver floppy, but I don't feel > > comfortable doing that. > > According to Donald's tulip page > (http://www.scyld.com/network/tulip.html), Netgear uses 21140-based > chips in their cards. Since I own a few NetGear FA310TX's and they all > use the old PNIC chip, it would tend to imply that you are referring to > a very old and possibly unavailable card... > > Jeff > > > > -- > Jeff Garzik | Liberty is always dangerous, but > Building 1024 | it is the safest thing we have. > MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- Harry Emerson Fosdick > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in > the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:33 EST