Re: Ethernet devices not named eth*

From: Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 23:30:02 EST


Dennis wrote:
>
> Is there any reason that ethernet devices not named eth* will not work? We
> need to create pseudo ethernet devices for bridge group references and it
> would be confusing if they were named eth* rather then bg*.
>
> There seems to be some table that they go into...any caveats?
>
> Dennis

They can be called whatever you want, within reason, so long as they are
no more than 15 characters long. They should probably NOT be called eth*,
as that will be confusing, as you mention.

There are some folks that already have bridging working too in the 2.3
kernel I think....

Ben

-- 
Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)  http://www.candelatech.com
Author of ScryMUD:  scry.wanfear.com 4444        (Released under GPL)
http://scry.wanfear.com               http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:40 EST