> Is there any reason that ethernet devices not named eth* will not work? We
> need to create pseudo ethernet devices for bridge group references and it
> would be confusing if they were named eth* rather then bg*.
> There seems to be some table that they go into...any caveats?
They can be called whatever you want, within reason, so long as they are
no more than 15 characters long. They should probably NOT be called eth*,
as that will be confusing, as you mention.
There are some folks that already have bridging working too in the 2.3
kernel I think....
-- Ben Greear (email@example.com) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:40 EST