"David S. Miller" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> From: Hirokazu Takahashi <email@example.com>
> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:42:43 +0900 (JST)
> I guess it may also depend on bad implementations of csum_partial().
> It's wrong that some architecture assume every data in a skbuff are
> aligned on a 2byte boundary so that it would access a byte next to
> the the last byte where no pages might be there.
> It is real requirement, x86 works because unaligned
> access is handled transparently by cpu.
> But on every non-x86 csum_partial I have examined, worse than
> 2-byte aligned data start is totally not handled. It is not difficult
> to figure out why this is the case, everyone has copied by example. :-)
x86-64 handles it (also in csum-copy). I think at least Alpha does it
too (that is where I stole the C csum-partial base from) But it's ugly.
See the odd hack.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:01 EST