Re: [Bridge] Re: [patch] A more general way to hook into the rx path.

From: scw@renlabs.com
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 13:01:37 EST


> People can implement proprietary TCP stacks using this "nifty
> hook" you've created. So I can't accept these changes.

Is this a religeous argument, or is there a technical or legal issue
lurking here that I'm not aware of? (Linux has all kinds of hooks people
can and do use to implement proprietary things. Is this one different
somehow?)

Thanks for clarifying!

Steve Work
scw@renlabs.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:00 EST