Re: [Bridge] Re: [patch] A more general way to hook into the rx path.

Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 13:01:37 EST

> People can implement proprietary TCP stacks using this "nifty
> hook" you've created. So I can't accept these changes.

Is this a religeous argument, or is there a technical or legal issue
lurking here that I'm not aware of? (Linux has all kinds of hooks people
can and do use to implement proprietary things. Is this one different

Thanks for clarifying!

Steve Work

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:00 EST