Re: ip header, which field to steal?

From: Sumit Pandya (sumit@elitecore.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 10:52:40 EST


Hi All,
    In my opinion, Bits 6-7 in ToS are reserved for future use and rfc does
not says anything as __MUST__ for these bits. Also ToS based routing
decision already implemented.
-- Sumit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Ho" <cbho@ie.cuhk.edu.hk>
To: "Linux Net" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Philip" <cbho@ie.cuhk.edu.hk>
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: ip header, which field to steal?

> Hi all
>
> I am finding a field inside IP header that I can steal for the purpose
> of custom routing. All the routers are Linux-based.
>
> I guess there are somebody out there do this before. If yes, then which
> field do you use?
>
> Assuming that there is no fragmentation occurring throughout the whole
> network, can I use identification field? That is, I modify it for my own
> purpose?
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Regards,
> philip
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:01 EST