Thanks. Can you give me more pointers about ToS based routing? any link?
Sumit Pandya wrote:
> Hi All,
> In my opinion, Bits 6-7 in ToS are reserved for future use and rfc does
> not says anything as __MUST__ for these bits. Also ToS based routing
> decision already implemented.
> -- Sumit
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philip Ho" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "Linux Net" <email@example.com>
> Cc: "Philip" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 12:37 PM
> Subject: ip header, which field to steal?
> > Hi all
> > I am finding a field inside IP header that I can steal for the purpose
> > of custom routing. All the routers are Linux-based.
> > I guess there are somebody out there do this before. If yes, then which
> > field do you use?
> > Assuming that there is no fragmentation occurring throughout the whole
> > network, can I use identification field? That is, I modify it for my own
> > purpose?
> > Thanks for your attention.
> > Regards,
> > philip
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> > the body of a message to email@example.com
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:01 EST