> David S. Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> [Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:38:20PM -0700]:
> From: email@example.com
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:48:02 +0400 (MSD)
> > I'm including a patch that avoids touching in6_rtmsg, and instead
> > passes the netlink message around. Is this acceptable?
> Yes, it looks OK. [original diff is copied for Dave]
I'm not too familiar with the Linux kernel development cycle. I assume
that this means that the fix will (eventually) show up in the 2.4 train
of kernels. If so, which 2.4 should I look for it to arrive in? Will it
also show up in 2.6 when that's released, or should I start pulling the
fix up to 2.5 now?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:01 EST