Linux-Net Archive
By Thread

• Re: IKE, Xauth and NAT-T David S. Miller (Sat Aug 16 2003 - 07:37:15 EST)
  • Re: IKE, Xauth and NAT-T H. Peter Anvin (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:58:44 EST)
    • Re: IKE, Xauth and NAT-T David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:00:51 EST)
      • Re: IKE, Xauth and NAT-T H. Peter Anvin (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:11:33 EST)
      • Re: IKE, Xauth and NAT-T David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:20:32 EST)
      • Re: IKE, Xauth and NAT-T H. Peter Anvin (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:22:40 EST)
• RE: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet Richard Underwood (Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:21:47 EST)
  • Re: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet David S. Miller (Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:33:02 EST)
    • Re: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet Carlos Velasco (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 08:23:30 EST)
      • Re: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:18:41 EST)
  • RE: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet Richard Underwood (Sat Aug 16 2003 - 10:26:26 EST)
    • RE: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet Carlos Velasco (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 08:35:58 EST)
      • Re: Bug with ARP - request source address on wrong subnet David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:21:17 EST)
• additional pointer into skb - where to initialize ?? Adam Flizikowski (Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:46:11 EST)
• [TCP] Update ext2_header_len when dst changes Herbert Xu (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 08:04:51 EST)
  • Re: [TCP] Update ext2_header_len when dst changes David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 02:06:16 EST)
• [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets Herbert Xu (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 11:06:09 EST)
  • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 11:06:10 EST)
  • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 11:06:10 EST)
    • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets Herbert Xu (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 10:17:20 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 10:17:02 EST)
    • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets kuznet (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 18:44:30 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:44:51 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets kuznet (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 12:10:34 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets Herbert Xu (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:36:38 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:24:54 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets kuznet (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 13:44:40 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets Herbert Xu (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 03:58:36 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets Herbert Xu (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 06:54:54 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets Herbert Xu (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 08:14:46 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 10:34:53 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets kuznet (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:00:42 EST)
      • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets David S. Miller (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:20:02 EST)
  • Re: [IPSEC] Move hardware headers for decaped packets kuznet (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 18:37:51 EST)
• Routing - where to put timing probes to examine it? Adam Flizikowski (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 13:56:01 EST)
• msr registers Adam Flizikowski (Sun Aug 17 2003 - 14:00:18 EST)
• Re: Linux Zero Copy Nagendra Singh Tomar (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:11:02 EST)
  • Re: Linux Zero Copy David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:39:58 EST)
    • Re: Linux Zero Copy Nagendra Singh Tomar (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:53:09 EST)
      • Re: Linux Zero Copy David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 00:55:19 EST)
      • Re: Linux Zero Copy Nagendra Singh Tomar (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:05:28 EST)
• [IPSEC] Oops when destroying stillborn states Herbert Xu (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 06:10:28 EST)
  • Re: [IPSEC] Oops when destroying stillborn states David S. Miller (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 06:29:18 EST)
• IP over X.25, Cisco Jerzy Tryjarski (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 06:10:28 EST)
• code changes for sock_alloc_send_skb() to avoid panics Prashanth T (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 07:56:25 EST)
• Linux and BSD networking code Adam Flizikowski (Mon Aug 18 2003 - 08:06:43 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Ratelimit SO_BSDCOMPAT warnings Denis Vlasenko (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 01:38:00 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Ratelimit SO_BSDCOMPAT warnings Jamie Lokier (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:37:00 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Ratelimit SO_BSDCOMPAT warnings Valdis . Kletnieks (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 12:16:43 EST)
• completion_queue, output_queue - what are they for Adam Flizikowski (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 04:34:48 EST)
  • Re: completion_queue, output_queue - what are they for Nagendra Singh Tomar (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 05:39:57 EST)
• IP over X.25 via asynchrous RS232 Jerzy Tryjarski (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 04:40:55 EST)
• rx interrupt boundaries (2.4.20 - 8139too.c) Adam Flizikowski (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 05:14:11 EST)
  • RE: rx interrupt boundaries (2.4.20 - 8139too.c) Eble, Dan (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 09:39:30 EST)
  • FW: rx interrupt boundaries (2.4.20 - 8139too.c) Adam Flizikowski (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 09:50:51 EST)
  • RE: rx interrupt boundaries (2.4.20 - 8139too.c) Eble, Dan (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 10:25:57 EST)
• more on module usage count Angelo Dell'Aera (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:37:28 EST)
  • Re: more on module usage count Stephen Hemminger (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 13:15:47 EST)
    • Re: more on module usage count Daniele Bellucci (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:44:56 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count David S. Miller (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:44:50 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Daniele Bellucci (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 14:37:27 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count David S. Miller (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:44:57 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Daniele Bellucci (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 15:38:52 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count David S. Miller (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 15:54:46 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Daniele Bellucci (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 15:59:27 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count David S. Miller (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:44:57 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Jeff Garzik (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:45:04 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Daniele Bellucci (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 16:57:18 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Jeff Garzik (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 16:02:58 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count Stephen Hemminger (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:45:10 EST)
      • Re: more on module usage count David S. Miller (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 23:05:44 EST)
• openldap-devel BOUNCE: Non-member submission Major Response (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:37:57 EST)
• [PATCH] sk_mca typo fix Angelo Dell'Aera (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:43:42 EST)
• loader Mehran Rezaei (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 12:58:09 EST)
• Virus Check Alert (Type-F) JENSVirusCheckService (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 22:52:03 EST)
• Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices Steven Blake (Tue Aug 19 2003 - 23:57:32 EST)
• I am on vacation Martin Renters (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 03:53:05 EST)
• Virus found in message from you! antivir (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 04:53:32 EST)
• Suggestion to Improve delivery to local destinations Narik Alatees (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 10:03:17 EST)
• unix socket descriptor leak with poll() in AC-patches (2.4.22-rc2-ac3) Wilfried Weissmann (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 11:21:58 EST)
• [no subject] danilo lujambio (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:44:29 EST)
• Re: can I used netlink to monitor changes to ARP table Jacob Teplitsky (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 14:44:33 EST)
  • Re: can I used netlink to monitor changes to ARP table kuznet (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 13:45:42 EST)
    • Re: can I used netlink to monitor changes to ARP table Jacob Teplitsky (Fri Aug 22 2003 - 18:56:02 EST)
• Content violation mailmng (Wed Aug 20 2003 - 19:39:37 EST)
• is sendto and recvfrom thread safe? Lee Chin (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 01:06:13 EST)
  • Re: is sendto and recvfrom thread safe? Stephen Hemminger (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 11:16:40 EST)
  • Re: is sendto and recvfrom thread safe? Lee Chin (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 15:01:48 EST)
    • Re: is sendto and recvfrom thread safe? Stephen Hemminger (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 16:33:43 EST)
• ip_forward - how to read instructions count Adam Flizikowski (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 08:56:47 EST)
• Multiple ethernet ports issue with SuSE SLES7.2 jansen, frank (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 13:06:12 EST)
  • Re: Multiple ethernet ports issue with SuSE SLES7.2 Jeff Garzik (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 14:45:57 EST)
  • RE: Multiple ethernet ports issue with SuSE SLES7.2 jansen, frank (Thu Aug 21 2003 - 14:57:21 EST)
• In my absence... Peter . Wiggin (Fri Aug 22 2003 - 00:59:27 EST)
• IPsec: Different ports pairs with different security associations Brian Buesker (Fri Aug 22 2003 - 11:14:49 EST)
• Why no dead gateway detection for Multipath routes? David Geller (Fri Aug 22 2003 - 14:21:00 EST)
• Symantec AVF detected that you sent a message with a prohibited attachment name administrator (Sat Aug 23 2003 - 01:12:24 EST)
• Persistent tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=* enable_bit=2 Keith Owens (Sat Aug 23 2003 - 21:54:21 EST)
  • Re: Persistent tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=* enable_bit=2 David S. Miller (Sat Aug 23 2003 - 23:27:53 EST)