Re: BUG in tcp_timer.c:tcp_retransmit_timer()

From: David S. Miller
Date: Tue Mar 30 2004 - 00:51:50 EST


On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:54:14 +0530 (IST)
Nagendra Singh Tomar <nagendra_tomar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thats right. But what about the other cases of retransmission
> failures for which we are having a negative return (-ENOMEM, -EAGAIN,
> -EHOSTUNREACH etc). Even for these cases its not a good idea to
> artificially increment tp->retransmits, lest in some extreme case we might
> timeout a connection without a single packet going on the wire.

That's just like the packet getting dropped at the next hop,
and not the case this branch of code intends to deal with.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html