Re: a couple of comments on xfrm

From: David S. Miller
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 17:09:54 EST

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:47:00 -0800
Brian Buesker <bbuesker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >I think this is fine, as long as we can be reasonably sure the
> >existing apps zero this thing out which I believe they do.
> Yes, racoon and setkey zero this field.
> >What does KAME do to support SPD priorities via PF_KEY,
> >does anyone know?
> Looking at the code real quick, it doesn't appear that they actually
> support priorities. It looks like each policy always gets inserted at
> the end of the list. I could be wrong though as I don't know the code
> very well.

Looks like the choice is ours and that it is safe, so just use
the reserved2 field as originally suggested.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at