Re: Different scheduler behavior between 2.4 and 2.6

From: pradeep singh
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 03:01:13 EST

On 4/30/07, Quan Sun <cfk.quan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/30/07, pradeep singh <2500.pradeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How did you reach to this conclusion?
> Try 100Hz + CONFIG_PREEMPT.I hope you must have tried this?
> Do you still face problem?
Yes. I'm sure.

> Is a lot of IO involved in your applications?
Yes. It's a heavy IO load network proxy.
heh... if a lot of disk I/O is required try changing the I/O scheduler too.
Make it CFQ, will help i guess.Read about Anticipatory and other IO
schedulers too. Though IMHO CFQ will be good enough.


Quan Sun

play the game
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at