Re: Different scheduler behavior between 2.4 and 2.6
From: Quan Sun
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 03:10:44 EST
On 4/30/07, pradeep singh <2500.pradeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
heh... if a lot of disk I/O is required try changing the I/O scheduler too.
Make it CFQ, will help i guess.Read about Anticipatory and other IO
schedulers too. Though IMHO CFQ will be good enough.
The problem is, my application is a heavy network socket IO proxy, and
no disk IO involved. :)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html