Re: TCP performance on a lossy 1Gbps link
From: Pieter Smit
Date: Fri Dec 11 2009 - 00:44:53 EST
I would suggest you look at the tcp congestion avoidance.
The Westwood algorithm: Quote "Its authors claim that Westwood is
especially good for wireless links or other situations where the loss
of an occasional packet may have nothing to do with congestion. "
# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_available_congestion_control
Pieter E Smit
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Randy Macleod <macleodr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matthew Hodgson wrote:
>> I've got a dedicated 1000Mbps link between two sites with a rtt of 7ms,
>> which seems to be dropping about 1 in 20000 packets (MTU of 1500 bytes).
>> I've got identical boxes at either end of the link running 2.6.27
>> (e1000e 0.3.3.3-k6), and I've been trying to saturate the link with TCP
>> transfers in spite of the packet loss.
> Sorry for the late reply...
> If you just want to avoid the dramatic impact of dropped packets
> due to something in the network getting overloaded,
> you might consider:
> PSPacer achieves precise network bandwidth control and smoothing of
> bursty traffic without any special hardware. It is implemented as a
> Linux loadable kernel module, i.e. a classful queuing discipline (Qdisc)
> module available for traffic control with tc (8) command.
> (2) PSPacer uses the IEEE 802.3x PAUSE frame as a gap between packets.
> Always seemed like a cool idea although I haven't tried it myself.
> Hope this isn't too late to help.
> // Randy
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html