Re: NFS question?

Olaf Kirch (okir@monad.swb.de)
Sun, 16 Jun 96 03:21 MET DST


In article <199606090539.BAA01894@cutter-john.mit.edu> you wrote:
[description of `text file busy' problem with nfsd deleted.]

: The problem is not with the kernel or AMD. The problem is the Linux
: NFS server, but getting a newer version won't help. This bug will
: probably never be fixed in the current Linux NFS server.

For the n-th time: newer nfsd's greatly reduce the time they keep a
file handle open (in the range of a few seconds). That should help
all but the fastest typists.

: (It will be
: fixed when somebody writes an NFS server for Linux which is not a
: complete crock, which some people are working on.)

Yes I'm working on a kernel-based nfsd. No the current user-space nfsd
is not complete crock. It works quite well with a fairly large variety
of NFS clients which is not that obvious once you have seen what crap
some NFS clients throw at their server and expect it to handle gracefully.

Olaf

--
Olaf Kirch         | `Put your pushbutton implementation down and come out
okir@monad.swb.de  | with your hands over your head and nobody will get hurt.'
                            Larry Cable on the need for new windowing systems