Re: US Goverment's View on Linux

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Thu, 2 Sep 1999 23:00:37 +0100 (BST)


Hi,

On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:54:21 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox
<alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> said:

>> a) aiming for compliance when putting the distribution together, and
>> b) forking out the cash for compliance testing.

> I believe for posix.1 b) is now free. You run the test suite and if you pass
> thats it

The testing is free, but afaik you still aren't compliant unless you
have a compliance document which explicitly states your behaviour in all
of the places where the spec says "implementation defined". (Behaviours
marked "undefined" don't have to be documented.)

--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu