Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: slicoss: Change return codes to -EYYY.
From: Denis Kirjanov
Date: Mon Jun 28 2010 - 10:13:08 EST
On 06/28/2010 03:14 PM, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ static void slic_link_event_handler(struct adapter *adapter)
#else
Stop compilation;
#endif
- ASSERT((status == STATUS_SUCCESS) || (status == STATUS_PENDING));
+ ASSERT(status == 0);
}
Now that looks useless since slic_upr_request can return STATUS_PENDING
or -ENOMEM. Same for slic_config_get
Yes, it seems that slic_link_event_handler& slic_config_get have to return error codes.
@@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static u32 slic_card_locate(struct adapter *adapter)
ASSERT(card);
if (!card)
- return STATUS_FAILURE;
+ return -ENOMEM;
Is -ENOMEM correct for this case?
Right, maybe ENXIO?
Yes, I'm fine with this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/