Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the arm64 tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:03:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/um/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   b62a8486de3a ("elfcore: Replace CONFIG_{IA64, UML} checks with a new option")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   6692531df62d ("uml/x86: use x86 load_unaligned_zeropad()")
> 
> from the vfs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> 
> diff --cc arch/x86/um/Kconfig
> index ead7e5b3a975,4eb47d3ba625..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
> @@@ -8,7 -8,7 +8,8 @@@ endmen
>   
>   config UML_X86
>   	def_bool y
>  +	select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_EXTRA_PHDRS if X86_32
> + 	select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
>   
>   config 64BIT
>   	bool "64-bit kernel" if "$(SUBARCH)" = "x86"

This is now a conflict between the vfs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpORegel27Ls.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature