Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups

[Sean Christopherson]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> So, what's the plan here: is your patch set Sean considered to supersede
> Maxim's earlier proposed changes or will you post an updated patch set
> incorporating at least some of them?

Next step is to reach a consensus on how we want to solve the problem (or if we
can't reach consensus, until Paolo uses his special powers).  I definitely won't
post anything new until there's more conversation.

> I am asking because I have a series that touches the same general area
> of KVM [1] and would preferably have it based on the final form of the
> event injection code to avoid unforeseen negative interactions between
> these changes.

I don't think you need to do anything, at a glance your changes are orthogonal
even though they have similar themes.  Any conflicts should be minor.