Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add device-tree for MT8195 Demo board
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Mon Mar 28 2022 - 09:47:26 EST
Il 27/03/22 22:03, Fabien Parent ha scritto:
Add basic device-tree for the MT8195 Demo board. The
Demo board is made by MediaTek and has a MT8195 SoC,
associated with the MT6359 and MT6360 PMICs, and
the MT7921 connectivity chip.
The IOs available on that board are:
* 1 USB Type-C connector with DP aux mode support
* 1 USB Type-A connector
* 1 full size HDMI RX and 1 full size HDMI TX connector
* 1 uSD slot
* 40 pins header
* SPI interface header
* 1 M.2 slot
* 1 audio jack
* 1 micro-USB port for serial debug
* 2 connectors for DSI displays
* 3 connectors for CSI cameras
* 1 connector for a eDP panel
* 1 MMC storage
This commit adds basic support in order to be able to boot.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
* remove empty i2c nodes
* remove empty spi node
* remove unused pcie pinctrls
* fixup node nodes to not contains underscore
* rename mt6360 pmic node
* move mmc1 node right after mmc0 node
* use generic node name for gpio-keys
* uniformize pinctrl node names
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts | 447 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 448 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts
..snip..
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d94b4e01159a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,447 @@
..snip..
+
+ gpio-keys {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ input-name = "gpio-keys";
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&gpio_keys_pins>;
+
+ key-0 {
key-volup is more descriptive, can you please change that?
+ gpios = <&pio 106 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ label = "volume_up";
+ linux,code = <KEY_VOLUMEUP>;
+ wakeup-source;
+ debounce-interval = <15>;
+ };
+ };
+};
+
..snip..
+
+&pmic {
+ interrupt-parent = <&pio>;
+ interrupts = <222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
I would instead use interrupts-extended here:
interrupts-extended = <&pio 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+};
+
+&i2c6 {
+ clock-frequency = <400000>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&i2c6_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ status = "okay";
+
+ mt6360: pmic@34 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt6360";
+ reg = <0x34>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ interrupt-parent = <&pio>;
+ interrupts = <101 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
Same here
+ interrupt-names = "IRQB";
+
...snip...
+
+&pio {
+ mmc0_default_pins: mmc0-default-pins {
+ pins-cmd-dat {
+ pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO126__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT0>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO125__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT1>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO124__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT2>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO123__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT3>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO119__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT4>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO118__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT5>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO117__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT6>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO116__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT7>,
+ <PINMUX_GPIO121__FUNC_MSDC0_CMD>;
+ input-enable;
+ drive-strength = <MTK_DRIVE_6mA>;
+ bias-pull-up = <MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01>;
+ };
+
+ pin-clk {
This is supposed to be "pins-clk", not "pin-clk"... same for all the other
instances of the "pin-".
Before pushing patches upstream, please run dtbs_check, as these are all
mistakes that will be pointed out by that.
Regards,
Angelo