Re: [PATCH] tracing: Set user_events to BROKEN
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Wed Mar 30 2022 - 12:54:22 EST
----- On Mar 29, 2022, at 10:25 PM, rostedt rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> After being merged, user_events become more visible to a wider audience
> that have concerns with the current API. It is too late to fix this for
> this release, but instead of a full revert, just mark it as BROKEN (which
> prevents it from being selected in make config). Then we can work finding
> a better API. If that fails, then it will need to be completely reverted.
Hi Steven,
What are the constraints for changing a uapi header after it has been present
in a kernel release ?
If we are not ready to commit to an ABI, perhaps it would be safer to ensure
that include/uapi/linux/user_events.h is not installed with the uapi headers
until it's ready.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2059213643.196683.1648499088753.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 16a52a71732d..edc8159f63ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -741,6 +741,7 @@ config USER_EVENTS
> bool "User trace events"
> select TRACING
> select DYNAMIC_EVENTS
> + depends on BROKEN # API needs to be straighten out
> help
> User trace events are user-defined trace events that
> can be used like an existing kernel trace event. User trace
> --
> 2.35.1
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com