[PATCH] genirq: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

From: cgel . zte
Date: Mon Apr 18 2022 - 07:07:27 EST


From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/irq/chip.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 54af0deb239b..8ddcb8e883d7 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -1576,11 +1576,9 @@ int irq_chip_pm_get(struct irq_data *data)
int retval;

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) && dev) {
- retval = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
- if (retval < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+ retval = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+ if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- }
}

return 0;
--
2.25.1