Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/virt/tdx: Implement the SEAMCALL base function

[Kai Huang]

On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 00:29 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> 
> On 4/19/22 9:16 PM, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 07:07 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 4/5/22 9:49 PM, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > > SEAMCALL leaf functions use an ABI different from the x86-64 system-v
> > > > ABI.  Instead, they share the same ABI with the TDCALL leaf functions.
> > > 
> > > TDCALL is a new term for this patch set. Maybe add some detail about
> > > it in ()?.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > TDCALL implementation is already in tip/tdx.  This series will be rebased to it.
> > I don't think we need to explain more about something that is already in the tip
> > tree?
> 
> Since you have already expanded terms like TD,TDX and SEAM in this patch
> set, I thought you wanted to explain TDX terms to make it easy for new 
> readers. So to keep it uniform, I have suggested adding some brief 
> details about the TDCALL.
> 
> 

All right.  I can add one sentence to explain it.

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai