EMFILE/ENFILE mitigation needed in erofs?

[David Howells]

Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +	fd_install(fd, file);

Do you need to mitigate potential EMFILE/ENFILE problems?  You're potentially
trebling up the number of accounted systemwide fds: one for erofs itself, one
anonfd per cache object file to communicate with the daemon and one in the
daemon to talk to the server.  Cachefiles has a fourth internally, but it's
kept off the books - further, cachefiles closes them fairly quickly after a
period of nonuse.

David