Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Broadcom internal lists aren't maintainers
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Fri Apr 22 2022 - 18:11:45 EST
On 4/22/22 10:42, William Zhang wrote:
On 4/22/22 10:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 4/20/22 14:31, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 11:50 -0700, William Zhang wrote:
On 4/19/22 16:11, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 12:00 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 4/12/2022 11:34 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
Convert the broadcom internal list M: and L: entries to R: as
exploder email addresses are neither maintainers nor mailing lists.
Reorder the entries as necessary.
[]
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
[]
@@ -3746,7 +3746,7 @@ F: include/linux/platform_data/b53.h
BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE
M: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
-L: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
+R: Broadcom Kernel Team <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
There is not a "Broadcom Kernel Team", the description of R:
appears to
require some kind of full name, hence the choice of L: instead of R:.
If you don't like "Broadcom Kernel Team", perhaps
"Broadcom Kernel Reviewers" might work for you.
I think it doesn't matter much.
I can see that we shouldn't use M as maintainer for this Broadcom
mailing list email. But I honestly don't understand why we have to use
R. Just for the sake of full name? Not everyone in this distribution
list is reviewer. IMHO I would prefer to change all entries to L
without a full name.
I think "R:" is a better choice than "L:"
"L:" Mailing list entries have archives that are publicly searchable.
Are the broadcom bcm-kernel-feedback-list entries publicly archived?
They are not indeed.
If not, these are one-way entries, so someone sends and hopes only.
Replies that are sent from these entries are not visible to the public.
OK, fair enough, I will change to:
R: Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
If that works for everyone?
Sounds good to me.
OK, now applied with the suggested change, thanks everyone.
--
Florian