Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] perf: Add SNOOP_PEER flag to perf mem data struct

[Andi Kleen]

> Except SNOOPX_FWD means a no modified cache snooping, it also means it's
> a cache conherency from *remote* socket.  This is quite different from we
> define SNOOPX_PEER, which only snoop from peer CPU or clusters.
>
> If no objection, I prefer we could keep the new snoop type SNOOPX_PEER,
> this would be easier for us to distinguish the semantics and support the
> statistics for SNOOPX_FWD and SNOOPX_PEER separately.
>
> I overlooked the flag SNOOPX_FWD, thanks a lot for Kan's reminding.

Yes seems better to keep using a separate flag if they don't exactly match.

It's not that we're short on flags anyways.

-Andi