Re: [PATCH][v2] mm/hugetlb: early exit from hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot() when max_huge_pages=0
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sun Aug 17 2025 - 22:59:58 EST
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 19:21:54 -0700 jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> On 8/14/2025 3:23 AM, lirongqing wrote:
> > From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Optimize hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot() to return immediately when
> > max_huge_pages is 0, avoiding unnecessary CPU cycles and the below
> > log message when hugepages aren't configured in the kernel command
> > line.
> > [ 3.702280] HugeTLB: allocation took 0ms with hugepage_allocation_threads=32
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff with v1: adding the reduced log messages in commit header
> >
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 753f99b..514fab5 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -3654,6 +3654,9 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages(struct hstate *h)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!h->max_huge_pages)
> > + return;
> > +
> > /* do node specific alloc */
> > if (hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_specific_nodes(h))
> > return;
>
> Looks good. Could you add stable: ?
Sure, I did that.
A Fixes: would be nice, to tell the -stable maintainers how far back in
time we need this, but the target sommit isn't obvious.