Re: [PATCH 10/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Add compatible for S32G

[James Clark]

On 18/08/2025 4:18 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:31:08PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > On 14/08/2025 7:25 pm, Frank Li wrote:
>
> > > binding doc should first patch. Create new patch serial for add S32G
> > > support only.
>
> > I'm not sure putting the binding doc commit first would be right? That would
> > imply it was a valid binding before it really was because the code change
> > hasn't been made yet. Practically both are required so it doesn't really
> > matter which way around they are.
>
> It's the general practice everyone has adopted (though in this case the
> bugfix bits might want to go before the bindings, possibly it's also a
> bit unusual to do that).  An unused binding is more acceptable than an
> undocumented one.

Fair enough. I can flip them in the next version.