Re: [PATCH 0/2] Workqueue: fs: replace use of system_wq and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users

[Marco Crivellari]

Hello Tejun and Christian,

> I believe all the prerequisites were already in -rc1 and you should be able
> to apply the series without pulling anything else. Marco, please correct me
> if I'm mistaken.

Yes the prerequisites are in rc1.

But there are changes introduced in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815094510.52360-4-marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx/
("Workqueue: WQ_PERCPU added to all the remaining users") that in my
opinion should be present as well when this series and the others are
merged.

For example, there are changes in __alloc_workqueue(), and also
changes inside queue_work() (include/kernel/workqueue.h) that were
added only in the "core" patches / series.

About queue_work() and the other functions, changes are made by
("Workqueue: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq") and
the related patch (about system_percpu_wq): it is mostly about add a
pr_warn_once() if the old wq is used, and redirect on the new one.

Btw: in this fs branch I only have the prerequisites and this series,
and I can compile and boot.

Thank you!


On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 1:23 AM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:23:26PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > If you agree with these changes, one option is pull the preparation changes from
> > > Tejun's wq branch [1].
> >
> > I'll take it through the vfs-6.18.workqueue branch.
> > Can I just pull the series from the list so we have all the lore links
> > and the cover letter?
>
> I believe all the prerequisites were already in -rc1 and you should be able
> to apply the series without pulling anything else. Marco, please correct me
> if I'm mistaken.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun



-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product




marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx