Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: simplify setpolicy/target check in driver verification
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Fri Aug 22 2025 - 03:16:49 EST
On 22-08-25, 15:04, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> Cpufreq drivers are supposed to use either ->setpolicy or
> ->target/->target_index. This patch simplifies the existing check by
> collapsing it into a single boolean expression:
>
> (!!driver->setpolicy == (driver->target_index || driver->target))
>
> This is a readability/maintainability cleanup and keeps the semantics
> unchanged.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index a067b5447fe8..633be16297d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2921,10 +2921,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> if (!driver_data || !driver_data->verify || !driver_data->init ||
> - !(driver_data->setpolicy || driver_data->target_index ||
> - driver_data->target) ||
> - (driver_data->setpolicy && (driver_data->target_index ||
> - driver_data->target)) ||
> + (!!driver_data->setpolicy == (driver_data->target_index || driver_data->target)) ||
> (!driver_data->get_intermediate != !driver_data->target_intermediate) ||
> (!driver_data->online != !driver_data->offline) ||
> (driver_data->adjust_perf && !driver_data->fast_switch))
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh