Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Replace strncpy with memcpy

[Marcelo Moreira]

Em qui., 21 de ago. de 2025 às 06:39, Carlos Maiolino <cem@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> Hi.

 Hi :)

> On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 12:50:41PM -0300, Marcelo Moreira wrote:
> > Following a suggestion from Dave and everyone who contributed to v1, this
> > changes modernizes the code by aligning it with current kernel best practices.
> > It improves code clarity and consistency, as strncpy is deprecated as explained
> > in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst. Furthermore, this change was tested
> > by xfstests
>
> > and as it was not an easy task I decided to document on my blog
> > the step by step of how I did it https://meritissimo1.com/blog/2-xfs-tests :).
>
> The above line does not belong to the commit description. I'm glad
> you've tested everything as we suggested and got to the point to run
> xfstests which indeed is not a single-click button. But the patch
> description is not a place to document it.
>
> >
> > This change does not alter the functionality or introduce any behavioral
> > changes.
>
> ^ This should be in the description...
>
> >
> > Changes include:
> >  - Replace strncpy with memcpy.
>
> ^ This is unnecessary. It's a plain copy/paste from the subject, no need
> to write yet again.
>
> >
> > ---
>
> ^ Keep a single --- in the patch... This is used as metadata, everything
>   below the first --- is ignored by git.
>
> > Changelog:
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Replace strncpy with memcpy instead of strscpy.
> > - The change was tested using xfstests.
> >
> > Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/CAPZ3m_jXwp1FfsvtR2s3nwATT3fER=Mc6qj+GzKuUhY5tjQFNQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> >
>
> ^ All those Changelog metadata should be below the ---, so they don't
> get into the commit message, but...
>
> > Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ^ Those should be before the '---' otherwise, as I mentioned, git will
> ignore those.
>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/symlink_repair.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/symlink_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/symlink_repair.c
> > index 953ce7be78dc..5902398185a8 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/symlink_repair.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/symlink_repair.c
> > @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ xrep_symlink_salvage_inline(
> >               return 0;
> >
> >       nr = min(XFS_SYMLINK_MAXLEN, xfs_inode_data_fork_size(ip));
> > -     strncpy(target_buf, ifp->if_data, nr);
> > +     memcpy(target_buf, ifp->if_data, nr);
> >       return nr;
>
> The change looks fine. Once you fix the above points:

Ok, all points are clear to me, I'll send v3 soon. Thanks Carlos!

> Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
:D

-- 
Cheers,
Marcelo Moreira