Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] i2c: rtl9300: use scoped guard instead of explicit lock/unlock

[Jonas Jelonek]

On 24.08.25 16:12, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
>> when the guard goes out of scope, instead of explicity lock/unlock. This
> …
>
> explicit? Would such a word be nicer in the next line?

I think I wanted to write 'explicitly' but not sure which variant is better.
Having it in the next line would probably be better, I'll fix this.

> Regards,
> Markus

Regards,
Jonas