Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask()

[Shrikanth Hegde]

On 8/26/25 9:43 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> This version uses Peter's suggestion from [1] as if and incrementally
> adds cleanup on top to the arch/ bits. I've tested the x86 side but the
> PowerPC and the s390 bits are only build tested. Review and feedback is
> greatly appreciated.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250825091910.GT3245006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Patches are prepared on top of tip:master at commit 4628e5bbca91 ("Merge
> branch into tip/master: 'x86/tdx'")
> ---
> changelog v6..v7:
>
> o Fix the s390 and ppc build errors (Intel test robot)
>
> o Use Peter's diff as is and incrementally do the cleanup on top. The
>    PowerPC part was slightly more extensive due to the lack of
>    CONFIG_SCHED_MC in arch/powerpc/Kconfig.
>
> v6: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250825120244.11093-1-kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx/
> ---
> K Prateek Nayak (7):
>    powerpc/smp: Rename cpu_corgroup_* to cpu_corgrp_*
>    powerpc/smp: Export cpu_coregroup_mask()
>    powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits
>    sched/topology: Unify tl_smt_mask() across core and all arch
>    sched/topology: Unify tl_cls_mask() across core and x86
>    sched/topology: Unify tl_mc_mask() across core and all arch
>    sched/topology: Unify tl_pkg_mask() across core and all arch
>
> Peter Zijlstra (1):
>    sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask()
Can the names be standardized to begin with tl_ ?

arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:			SDTL_INIT(smallcore_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SMT);
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:			SDTL_INIT(shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, CACHE);
arch/s390/kernel/topology.c:	SDTL_INIT(cpu_book_mask, NULL, BOOK),
arch/s390/kernel/topology.c:	SDTL_INIT(cpu_drawer_mask, NULL, DRAWER),
kernel/sched/topology.c:	tl[i++] = SDTL_INIT(sd_numa_mask, NULL, NODE);
kernel/sched/topology.c:		tl[i] = SDTL_INIT(sd_numa_mask, cpu_numa_flags, NUMA);