Re: [PATCH] Loongarch: entry: fix syscall_get_arguments() VS no-bultin-memcpy

[Xi Ruoyao]

On Thu, 2025-08-28 at 15:09 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 3:06 PM Wentao Guan <guanwentao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello Ruoyao,
> > 
> > Thanks for your review.
> > I will test and send test results later.
> > (use different gcc verions and remove the three flags.)
> I think kernel's memcpy is still needed for CPUs without UAL.

GCC memcpy expansion correctly understands no-UAL case.  It won't
generate unaligned access unless -mno-strict-align.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>