Re: [PATCH] selftests/thermel/intel/workload_hint: Mask unsupported types
From: srinivas pandruvada
Date: Thu Aug 28 2025 - 15:56:13 EST
On Thu, 2025-08-28 at 21:34 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:23 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The workload hint may contain some other hints which are not
> > defined.
> > So mask out unsupported types. Currently only lower 4 bits of
> > workload
> > type hints are defined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
> > <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c | 3
> > +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > index ba58589a1145..3ee018bca899 100644
> > ---
> > a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > +++
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > } else if (ret == 0) {
> > printf("Poll Timeout\n");
> > } else {
> > +
>
> Is this change intentional? Looks like it is not needed.
Not intentional. Will send update.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> > if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set
> > pointer to beginning\n");
> > exit(1);
> > @@ -144,6 +145,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > ret = sscanf(index_str, "%d", &index);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> > +
> > + index &= 0x0f;
> > if (index > WORKLOAD_TYPE_MAX_INDEX)
> > printf("Invalid workload type
> > index\n");
> > else
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> >
>