Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: Fix redundant updates for already poisoned pages

[Miaohe Lin]

On 2025/8/29 2:38, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Duplicate memory errors can be reported by multiple sources.
> 
> Passing an already poisoned page to action_result() causes issues:
> 
> * The amount of hardware corrupted memory is incorrectly updated.
> * Per NUMA node MF stats are incorrectly updated.
> * Redundant "already poisoned" messages are printed.
> 
> Avoid those issues by:
> 
> * Skipping hardware corrupted memory updates for already poisoned pages.
> * Skipping per NUMA node MF stats updates for already poisoned pages.
> * Dropping redundant "already poisoned" messages.
> 
> Make MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED consistent with other action_page_types and
> make calls to action_result() consistent for already poisoned
> normal pages and huge pages.
> 
> Fixes: b8b9488d50b7 ("mm/memory-failure: improve memory failure action_result messages")
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle.meyer@xxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch. This patch looks good to me.

Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.
.

> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>  * Continue passing poisoned pages to action_result() with MF_FAILED but don't
> update anything.
>  * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250821164445.14467-1-kyle.meyer@xxxxxxx
> 
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index fc30ca4804bf..10b3c281c2ae 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static const char * const action_page_types[] = {
>  	[MF_MSG_BUDDY]			= "free buddy page",
>  	[MF_MSG_DAX]			= "dax page",
>  	[MF_MSG_UNSPLIT_THP]		= "unsplit thp",
> -	[MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED]	= "already poisoned",
> +	[MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED]	= "already poisoned page",
>  	[MF_MSG_UNKNOWN]		= "unknown page",
>  };
>  
> @@ -1349,9 +1349,10 @@ static int action_result(unsigned long pfn, enum mf_action_page_type type,
>  {
>  	trace_memory_failure_event(pfn, type, result);
>  
> -	num_poisoned_pages_inc(pfn);
> -
> -	update_per_node_mf_stats(pfn, result);
> +	if (type != MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED) {
> +		num_poisoned_pages_inc(pfn);
> +		update_per_node_mf_stats(pfn, result);
> +	}
>  
>  	pr_err("%#lx: recovery action for %s: %s\n",
>  		pfn, action_page_types[type], action_name[result]);
> @@ -2094,12 +2095,11 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
>  		*hugetlb = 0;
>  		return 0;
>  	} else if (res == -EHWPOISON) {
> -		pr_err("%#lx: already hardware poisoned\n", pfn);
>  		if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) {
>  			folio = page_folio(p);
>  			res = kill_accessing_process(current, folio_pfn(folio), flags);
> -			action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED, MF_FAILED);
>  		}
> +		action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED, MF_FAILED);
>  		return res;
>  	} else if (res == -EBUSY) {
>  		if (!(flags & MF_NO_RETRY)) {
> @@ -2285,7 +2285,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  		goto unlock_mutex;
>  
>  	if (TestSetPageHWPoison(p)) {
> -		pr_err("%#lx: already hardware poisoned\n", pfn);
>  		res = -EHWPOISON;
>  		if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
>  			res = kill_accessing_process(current, pfn, flags);
>