Re: [PATCH 0/2] rust: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users

From: Marco Crivellari
Date: Mon Sep 08 2025 - 06:24:42 EST


On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 12:59 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I mean that instead of:
>
> +/// Returns the system unbound work queue (`system_dfl_wq`).
> ///
> /// Workers are not bound to any specific CPU, not concurrency managed, and all queued work items
> /// are executed immediately as long as `max_active` limit is not reached and resources are
> /// available.
> pub fn system_unbound() -> &'static Queue {
> - // SAFETY: `system_unbound_wq` is a C global, always available.
> - unsafe { Queue::from_raw(bindings::system_unbound_wq) }
> + // SAFETY: `system_dfl_wq` is a C global, always available.
> + unsafe { Queue::from_raw(bindings::system_dfl_wq) }
> }
>
> you add a new function:
>
> pub fn system_dfl() -> &'static Queue {
> // SAFETY: `system_dfl_wq` is a C global, always available.
> unsafe { Queue::from_raw(bindings::system_dfl_wq) }
> }
>
> and do *not* modify system_unbound().
>
> Alice

Hello Alice,

Ah, perfect. Yes it makes sense this change, you're right.
I will send the v2 introducing the new functions for both the patches
in this series.

It would also make sense to also change the above comment, mentioning that
system_unbound() uses a wq that will be removed in the future, and so
it is better to
use system_dfl() instead?

I'm thinking to something like:

+///
+/// Note: system_unbound_wq will be removed in a future release
cycle. Use system_dfl_wq instead.
pub fn system_unbound() -> &'static Queue {
// SAFETY: `system_unbound_wq` is a C global, always available.
unsafe { Queue::from_raw(bindings::system_unbound_wq) }
}

+pub fn system_dfl() -> &'static Queue {
+ // SAFETY: `system_dfl_wq` is a C global, always available.
+ unsafe { Queue::from_raw(bindings::system_dfl_wq) }
+}

Sounds good?

Thanks!

--

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product

marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx