Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: mcq: Fix memory allocation checks for SQE and CQE
From: Peter Wang (王信友)
Date: Mon Sep 08 2025 - 08:06:58 EST
On Sun, 2025-09-07 at 12:40 -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote:
>
> Previous checks incorrectly tested the DMA addresses (dma_handle)
> for NULL. Since dma_alloc_coherent() returns the CPU (virtual)
> address, the NULL check should be performed on the *_base_addr
> pointer to correctly detect allocation failures.
>
> Update the checks to validate sqe_base_addr and cqe_base_addr
> instead of sqe_dma_addr and cqe_dma_addr.
>
> Fixes: 4682abfae2eb ("scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Allocate memory for MCQ
> mode")
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1 -> v2
> rephrase commit message and added Reviewed-by Alim
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> index 1e50675772fe..cc88aaa106da 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ int ufshcd_mcq_memory_alloc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> hwq->sqe_base_addr = dmam_alloc_coherent(hba->dev,
> utrdl_size,
> &hwq-
> >sqe_dma_addr,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!hwq->sqe_dma_addr) {
> + if (!hwq->sqe_base_addr) {
> dev_err(hba->dev, "SQE allocation failed\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ int ufshcd_mcq_memory_alloc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> hwq->cqe_base_addr = dmam_alloc_coherent(hba->dev,
> cqe_size,
> &hwq-
> >cqe_dma_addr,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!hwq->cqe_dma_addr) {
> + if (!hwq->cqe_base_addr) {
> dev_err(hba->dev, "CQE allocation failed\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>