Re: [PATCH 0/3] bpf: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri,  5 Sep 2025 10:53:06 +0200 you wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Below is a summary of a discussion about the Workqueue API and cpu isolation
> considerations. Details and more information are available here:
> 
>         "workqueue: Always use wq_select_unbound_cpu() for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND."
>         https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/3] bpf: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/34f86083a4e1
  - [2/3] bpf: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0409819a0021
  - [3/3] bpf: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a857210b104f

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html