Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] md/raid1,raid10: Do not set MD_BROKEN on failfast io failure

[Kenta Akagi]

On 2025/09/08 10:20, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2025/09/02 0:48, Kenta Akagi 写道:
>> In the current raid1_end_write_request implementation,
>> - md_error is called only in the Failfast case.
>> - Afterwards, if the rdev is not Faulty (that is, not Failfast,
>>    or Failfast but the last rdev — which originally was not expected
>>    MD_BROKEN in RAID1), R1BIO_WriteError is set.
>> In the suggested implementation, it seems that a non-Failfast write
>> failure will immediately mark the rdev as Faulty, without retries.
> 
> I still prefer a common helper to unify the code, not sure if I still
> missing something ...
> 
> In general, if bio failed, for read/write/metadata/resync should be the
> same:
> 
> 1) failfast is set, and not last rdev, md_error();
> 2) otherwise, we should always retry;
> 
> And I do believe it's the best to unify this by a common helper.

Yes, I realized that my idea is bad. Your idea is best,
especially considering the error handling in super_written.
I'll implement a common helper.

By the way, I think md_error should only be serialized on RAID1 and 10
for now. Serializing unnecessary personalities is inefficient and can
lead to unfavorable results. What do you think?

Thanks,
Akagi

> Thanks,
> Kuai
> 
>