Re: [PATCH 1/1] module: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

[Marco Crivellari]

On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:37 PM Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Petr,

> If I understand the cover letter and its linked discussion correctly,
> the aim is to eventually move users to unbound workqueues unless they
> really need to use per-CPU workqueues.

Yes, correct. This first round is just a 1:1 conversion keeping the
old behavior.
But later yes, the aim is to let per-cpu just who needs to be per-cpu.

> The two work items queued by the dups.c code can run anywhere. I don't
> see a reason why they need to be bound to a specific CPU.

> If it helps, I believe you can already update this code to use the new
> system_dfl_wq.

Cool, I will send the v2 converting directly from system_wq to system_dfl_wq.

Thank you!

-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product

marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx